Ranchers and Empire in the American West
by Ryan McMaken on April 14, 2014
The militarized siege of a cattle ranch near Bunkerville, Nevada has drawn national attention as dozens of federal agents, armed with machine guns, sniper rifles, helicopters, and more, have descended on the ranch to seize cattle, people, and generally show everyone who’s boss.
The press has framed the story in a variety of ways, casting the story both as matter of outright federal seizure of private land, and as an absurd environmental crusade to save a tortoise from extinction.
The reality looks to be a little murkier, however, as is often the case when dealing with land ownership in the American West. Back in September, the Las Vegas Sun reported on the Bundy family and noted that troubles began 20 years ago when the family’s patriarch unilaterally determined that he would no longer pay the Bureau of Land Management use fees that have long been required to graze on federal lands. The exact legal and historical details of the Bundy family’s case will emerge slowly over time, but even if the family is completely in the wrong legally (which it probably is), it’s safe to say that taxpayer dollars might be better spent on things other than a shock and awe campaign waged against a tiny ranch in the middle of a Nevada desert. Nonetheless, this is just the latest dispute in a long history of ranchers jockeying with the Federal government over land use permits and land use regulations.
While those who are unfamiliar with land use in the West may see this as some sort of new dastardly deed on the part of the federal government, it is in fact the case that leasing federal land for grazing (among many other things) has been the status quo in the West for more than a century, and the federal government has owned at least 40 percent or more of the land in many Western states ever since it was annexed to the United States in the nineteenth century. In fact, the nation’s 13 Western states are home to 93 percent of federal land, with two-thirds of all land in Utah, and 81 percent of all land in Nevada owned by the feds.
The image of the American West as a place of private property and blissful independence from government control has long been a myth, and the fact is that life in the West has involved the federal government much more so than life in the East much of the time. This is because the land and other natural resources in the West are controlled by a vast socialist bureaucracy governing water, land, and minerals going back to the late nineteenth century.
The Rise of the Federal Bureaucracy in the West
In his history of the American West, Richard White
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0393342379/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=0393342379&linkCode=as2&tag=transie-20">Railroaded: The Transcontinentals and the Making of Modern America</a><img src="http://ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=transie-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0393342379" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />
Beginning in the 1890s, the central government ceased to be a nursemaid to the future states and a prodigal distributor of resources to the country’s citizens and corporations. Washington instead became a manager of Western land, resources, and, inevitably, people.
By 1903, Theodore Roosevelt’s Public Land Commission solidified the concept of public ownership throughout the West, thus ending the idea that all lands in the West should be distributed via the homestead acts.
The rise of the Bureau of Reclamation (which managed water) and the Bureau of Land Management ensured that both water and land would be controlled either directly or indirectly by federal government agencies indefinitely. Leases for land for oil drilling, mining, and grazing quickly became important for doing business in the region, and naturally, maintaining influence within federal agencies under such conditions was a key to success.
Support for federal control in the region remained widespread among Westerners themselves. As a region that was poorer and less able to attract capital than the East, many Westerners quickly made peace with this system of federal ownership, not least of all because the Federal government, through subsidies, public works programs, and military spending, had become an economic driver in the West.
In later decades, the federal agencies would also be influenced by new environmental and conservationist groups, but for all the talk of preserving the desert tortoise in the Bundy Ranch case, it should not surprise anyone if we find later that major oil and gas firms
, and Chinese at that,
are actually behind the drive to finally end desert access for small ranchers.
The Legacy of Empire in the West
The American West is administered not locally, but
from D.C. where the borders of new states where drawn, where non elected officials are appointed, and orders given to federal troops who policed the region. Even after statehood was granted the region remained dominated by the federal government.. It was in the West that the United States government learned how to be an empire;
(Patrick Buchanan said this 20 years ago in his book
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0895261596/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=0895261596&linkCode=as2&tag=transie-20">A Republic, Not an Empire: Reclaiming America’s Destiny</a><img src="http://ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=transie-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0895261596" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />
This legacy continues today. As we view the standoff in Nevada, we see
any in the West today now find themselves victims of the same federal government that their ancestors once cheered
, an irony that brings them small solace.